VCs are not living Buddhas. They are betting that the invested company will eventually reach a monopoly position, and then they will be able to raise the price of their services and bring everything back to the right track. There are also risks in the middle. If the invested company cannot occupy the majority of the market in the end, it will not be able to obtain monopoly benefits, and all previous investments will be in vain. In a way, it's like Texas Hold'em, where you just keep adding, and either the winner sms marketing service takes all, or the loser. And what does failure mean for all parties involved? For VCs, this may not be a big deal. Most VCs follow the principle of diversification, and the failure of a company is just a drop in the bucket for them. As long as one of the invested companies can rise, the benefits brought by it are more than enough to make up for the losses caused by other investments. And for startup founders, as long as company finances aren't tied to personal finances, it doesn't seem to have any impact other than a temporary hit to self-esteem. On the contrary, this valuable entrepreneurial
top of page
SWEET CRUDE
bottom of page