An independent person first needs to have the ability to "think independently".
At work, we often encounter similar inquiries from others.
Like what:
"What do you think?" "Any other thoughts or opinions?" "Which of the two schemes is better, A and B, and why?"
Looking back, what I was most afraid of was this kind of unguarded "surprise attack", especially in the collective discussion, I wish I could instantly become invisible.
The reason why I am afraid of others asking questions is not that I usually read or learn too little, but that in the process, I have never left time for independent thinking.
So when someone else wants to get a "unique perspective" from you, you're filled with standard answers that others chewed up.
On the contrary, a word in particular popular in these two years is called: critical thinking.
The so-called critical thinking, it is Latest Mailing Database actually a process that requires you to stand in different positions and adopt different perspectives, so as to form a pluralistic way of thinking.
For example, a few years ago, Zhang Xiaolong mentioned in an internal email:
I hope that our daily work is also a process of speculation. We advocate argumentation, and in the work of discerning to find the right solution, rather than for the sake of team interests or interpersonal relationships, so as to give up the ability to think critically or even the habit of speculation. Progress comes from speculation.
It can be seen that in today's world of fierce competition and the knowledge economy, "having your own unique point of view" has become a basic skill that everyone must have.
This is the topic I'm going to share today: Mastering 3 Ways to Quickly Craft Your Own Unique Perspective.
First, reset the premise
How is a person's point of view formed?
There are usually two kinds: one is persuaded by others, and the other is persuaded by oneself (experience).
The process of organizing views is actually the process of marketing and being marketed; As the saying goes, "A thousand Hamlets are in a thousand hearts," so there is no right or wrong in the opinion itself.
However, if you have read "Strange Story", then you may find that the views held by different people are old and new, or unique and boring.
People we call interesting people, when faced with the same problem, often come up with different and novel ideas.
If your job is related to content, marketing, copywriting, creative, or communication, then you must also know the power behind "unique ideas."
So, how do you unearth a different perspective?
If we start from a dialectical point of view, the shape of any point of view is inseparable from three elements: presupposition, theoretical basis, and observation angle.
Therefore, when you want to put forward a new point of view, you can also subvert these 3 points, namely: resetting the premise, cross-border interpretation, and switching perspectives.
First, how do you "reset the premise"?
When most people express their opinions, they are often limited by the internal perspective, which we can call "hidden premises".
For example, many parents believe that their children should not play games. The hidden premise of this view is that playing games affects academic performance. In the process of parental education, similar views undoubtedly simplify our expression, but on the other hand, they also limit our thinking. Why are parents opposed to children playing games? There may be many reasons for this, such as most parents who have never played a game at all, they equate playing games with greed, children insisting on playing games is equal to disobedience, and so on. So, if we want to change this view, we need to break the hidden premises that are pre-set. For example, in fact, every era has things that children are easily fascinated by, which in the past may be novels, toys, television, but now it has become a game. Many people love to watch TV when they are young, and they are not admitted to a good university?
So you see, when we put the focus on the preconceived premise of the point of view, we are not far from the truth of the answer.